000 03665naaaa2200529uu 4500
001 https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41802
005 20230310124428.0
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20200923s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 _aoso/9780198832331.001.0001
040 _aoapen
_coapen
024 7 _a10.1093/oso/9780198832331.001.0001
_cdoi
041 0 _aeng
042 _adc
072 7 _aKC
_2bicssc
072 7 _aKCM
_2bicssc
072 7 _aJFFJ
_2bicssc
100 1 _aCramer, Christopher
_4auth
700 1 _aSENDER, JOHN
_4auth
700 1 _aOqubay, Arkebe
_4auth
245 1 0 _aAfrican Economic Development
_bEvidence, Theory, Policy
260 _aOxford
_bOxford University Press
_c2020
300 _a1 electronic resource (336 p.)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _aThis book challenges conventional wisdoms both about economic performance and about policies for economic development in African countries. Its starting point is the striking variation in economic performance: unevenness and inequalities form a central fact. The authors highlight not only differences between African countries but also variations within countries, differences often organized around distinctions of gender, class, and ethnic identity. For example, school dropout and neonatal mortality have been reduced, particularly for some classes of women in some areas. Horticultural and agribusiness exports have grown far more rapidly in some countries than others. These variations (and many others) point to opportunities for changing performance, reducing inequalities, learning from other African policy experiences, and escaping the ties of structure and legacies of a colonial past. The book rejects teleological illusions and Eurocentric prejudice, but does pay close attention to the results of policy in more industrialized parts of the world. Seeing the contradictions of capitalism for what they are—fundamental and enduring—may help policy officials protect themselves against the misleading idea that development is likely to be a smooth, linear process, or that it would be were certain impediments removed. The authors criticize a wide range of orthodox and heterodox economists, especially for their cavalier attitude to statistical sources. Drawing on decades of research and policy experience, they combine careful use of available evidence from a range of African countries with heterodox political economy insights (mainly derived from Kalecki, Kaldor, and Hirschman) to make the policy case for specific types of public sector investment.
540 _aCreative Commons
_fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
_2cc
_4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
546 _aEnglish
650 7 _aEconomics
_2bicssc
650 7 _aDevelopment economics & emerging economies
_2bicssc
650 7 _aSocial discrimination & inequality
_2bicssc
653 _aAfrican
653 _aeconomic development
653 _apolicy
653 _ainvestment
653 _agender
653 _aagribusiness
653 _aheterodox
653 _apolitical economy
653 _aHirschman
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/4c38c64d-cb7f-4311-b989-6d00c06bd385/9780198832331.pdf
_70
_zOAPEN Library: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41802
_70
_zOAPEN Library: description of the publication
999 _c5838
_d5838
909 _a4
_bDarya Shvetsova
_c4
_dDarya Shvetsova