000			03099naaaa2200397uu 4500
001			https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/47518
003			BUT
005			20230307122134.0
006			m o d
007			cr|mn|---annan
008			20210325s2020 xx |||||o ||| por|| d
020			_a9783-44773285
020			_a9783944773292
040			_coapen
041	0		_apor
080			_a94
100	1		_ade Oliveira Coutinho Silva, Luisa Stella _4auth
245	1	0	_aNem teúdas, nem manteúdas _bHistória das Mulheres e Direito na capitania da Paraíba (Brasil, 1661–1822)
260			_aFrankfurt am Main _bMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory _c2020
300			_a1 electronic resource (396 p.)
490	1		_aGlobal Perspectives on Legal History _vv.15
506	0		_aOpen Access _2star _fUnrestricted online access
520			_aThis book develops a legal history of colonial women as a methodological approach to studying the women of Paraíba, a captaincy on the northeast coast of Brazil, from the end of the Dutch occupation (1661) to Brazilian independence in 1822. It uses the concept of multiple normativities to analyse dozens of daily life cases from Portuguese and Brazilian archives. To study women’s everyday normative contexts in a colonial space, the author analyses traditional Ius Commune and Portuguese legal sources from different jurisdictions, but also legal doctrines, medical treatises, moralist works and literature to enrich interpretations in women’s history, gender studies, feminist legal theory and legal history. Furthermore, she examines the impact of these normative traditions in the colonial Captaincy of Paraíba and focuses on normativities of a more pragmatic character, analysing archival documents portraying women’s daily life situations relating to both secular and religious jurisdictions. The analysis demonstrates that the law from the metropole neither offered pre-established solutions for women’s daily lives, nor was it applied unchanged in the colony. On the ground, law was dynamic, and the interplay of multiple normativities provided different possibilities that depended on the intersection of women’s condition and status, religion and sexual options, proving that sex and gender categories are not immutable, but, on the contrary, flexible according to the practices of law in colonial Paraíba.
540			_aCreative Commons _fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ _2cc
546			_aPortuguese
650		0	_aИстория отдельных стран и народов _92152
700	1		_aDuve, Thomas _4edt
700	1		_aVogenauer, Stefan _4edt
700	1		_aDuve, Thomas _4oth
700	1		_aVogenauer, Stefan _4oth
830			_94313 _aGlobal Perspectives on Legal History _vv.15
856	4	0	_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/47518/gplh-15-9783944773285.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y _zDownload
856	4	0	_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/47518 _zDecription
909			_c4 _dDarya Shvetsova
942			_2udc _cEE
999			_c4974 _d4974